<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Proof: 1 + 1 = 0 ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/</link>
	<description>Problem Solving Math Olympiad For Primary School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:10:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VARDHAN H DONTHI</title>
		<link>http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>VARDHAN H DONTHI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathandflash.com/?p=129#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Within the square root, can we take  sqrt. (-1)(-1) as  sqrt.(-1)*sqrt.(-1). Is that possible. Think over it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Within the square root, can we take  sqrt. (-1)(-1) as  sqrt.(-1)*sqrt.(-1). Is that possible. Think over it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohedi</title>
		<link>http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathandflash.com/?p=129#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Okay brother, Now I need your help to deliver my general exact formula for Pi number to all visitors here and your colleagues that until now has been posted at  the link :

http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&amp;t=148.

Regards,
Rohedi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay brother, Now I need your help to deliver my general exact formula for Pi number to all visitors here and your colleagues that until now has been posted at  the link :</p>
<p><a href="http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&#038;t=148" rel="nofollow">http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&#038;t=148</a>.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Rohedi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathandflash.com/?p=129#comment-35</guid>
		<description>@Rohedi:nice idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rohedi:nice idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohedi</title>
		<link>http://mathandflash.com/the-proof-1-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathandflash.com/?p=129#comment-31</guid>
		<description>1 + 1 = 0 ?

Oh it is not supprised, because when refering to euclid theory there are two values for square root (sqrt) of every positive numbers. So the square root of 1 are plus 1 and/or -1. So when representing one of the number one at left sides   
1+sqrt(1) we will find 1+1=2, or 1-1=0, even when both one are represented in square root : sqrt(1)+sqrt(1)=-1-1=-2, aren&#039;t there, hehehe. Maybe the primary reason why euclidian theory tends to unrecognize, because sometime it yeilds uncostumarily results.

Happy with you brother..

Rohedi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 + 1 = 0 ?</p>
<p>Oh it is not supprised, because when refering to euclid theory there are two values for square root (sqrt) of every positive numbers. So the square root of 1 are plus 1 and/or -1. So when representing one of the number one at left sides<br />
1+sqrt(1) we will find 1+1=2, or 1-1=0, even when both one are represented in square root : sqrt(1)+sqrt(1)=-1-1=-2, aren&#8217;t there, hehehe. Maybe the primary reason why euclidian theory tends to unrecognize, because sometime it yeilds uncostumarily results.</p>
<p>Happy with you brother..</p>
<p>Rohedi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

